#Hrt 2 tv program live in ten full#

2, Doma TV (and RTL 2 channels carry similar type of. Emily has no family history of breast, ovarian or endometrial cancer and does not exhibit any of the above ailments.Д¦ Public TV Station вЂ“ HRT (Hrvatska Radio Televizija) (As of December 2012, there are ten nationwide free-to-air DVB-T television channels, with.

Panay elaborates that having a malignancy that is oestrogen receptor positive is a significant reason to not have HRT, вЂњbut some women choose to take the risk if they have intractable symptoms that do not respond to other treatments.вЂќ Pinkerton agrees and adds to the list вЂњwomen with unexplained vaginal bleeding, prior oestrogen-sensitive breast or endometrial cancer, severe active liver disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, dementia, a high risk of thromboembolic diseaseвЂќ. She warns, though, that вЂњsome women are definitely not a candidate for any form of hormones, for example вЂ“ and especially вЂ“ those with a family history of breast cancer in a grandmother, aunt, sister or motherвЂќ.

#Hrt 2 tv program live in ten full#

вЂњWhat I usually tell patients is that 100 years ago we lived to 60, however life expectancy now is 85, so it seems obvious that we need some hormones after the age of 50, that is post-menopausal, to live full and healthy lives,вЂќ she says. вЂњFor most women, the pros outweigh the cons if they donвЂ™t have specific risk factors.вЂќ Dr Susan Jamieson, an integrative medical specialist with her own clinic in Central, Hong Kong, explains why she is a keen advocate of HRT in the right patients. The risk of breast cancer, he says, is less than one extra case per 1,000 women per year вЂ“ less than alcohol and obesity. Those fears were exaggerated, says Nicholas Panay, an eminent London-based consultant gynaecologist, specialising in reproductive medicine and surgery and menopause.

The women who continue to resist HRT prescriptions do so primarily because it was linked to breast cancer following a study more than a decade ago вЂ“ which caused a 50 per cent decline in use. вЂњWomen continue to be afraid of hormone therapy, despite new data which demonstrates that benefits outweigh the risks for many healthy postmenopausal women,вЂќ she says. When Emily described her treatment вЂ“ and the reasons for it вЂ“ to friends, however, their reaction was unexpected: вЂњThey all recoiledвЂќ, she says, вЂњas if I were trialling some dangerous new drug, some suspicious snake oil.вЂќ Dr JoAnn Pinkerton, executive director of the North American Menopause Society and professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at the University of Virginia, isnвЂ™t surprised. вЂњIвЂ™m on HRT,вЂќ she says, вЂњnot just because I was exhibiting frustrating signs of menopause, but because a bone-density scan revealed osteopenia, which seemed to be advanced for my age.вЂќ Osteopenia is the precursor to osteoporosis, porous bones that become weak and break easily.ДЇalling oestrogen levels during menopause is one of the causes. Emily, 52, recounts how her gynaecologist described doctors who refused to entertain the idea of HRT for patients as вЂњbordering on negligentвЂќ. Even medical professionals are divided on it. Some women embrace it, others are fearful of it. In the ensuing decades, different delivery methods, dosages and hormone combinations have been developed, and conflicting studies have shown benefits and risks.

To relieve these symptoms, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), was introduced in the 1940s. About 80 per cent of menopausal women experience hot flushes, thinning hair, mood swings and poor sleep. The time that marks the end of menstrual cycles, usually in the 40s or 50s, can be a cause for celebration, but it may also usher in some unwelcome symptoms caused by falling hormone levels. For women, one that gives us pause is menopause. As we age, we are faced with exciting opportunities вЂ“ and difficult challenges, particularly regarding our bodies.